Bar News - March 23, 2001
District Court Jury Project Suspended
THE SUPREME COURT has announced that it is suspending the district court jury session in Rockingham and Merrimack Counties.
"Demands on the system and insufficient resources to meet those demands forced us to suspend district court jury trials indefinitely," Chief Justice David A. Brock said. As of April 1, the NH Superior Court will resume handling cases from the district court in which a defendant appeals his or her conviction by a judge and asks for a jury trial, which has been the procedure in other counties.
The district court judges who had been presiding at jury trials will be reassigned to help reduce the increasing volume of non-jury district court cases, particularly in Nashua and Manchester. Current funding levels are insufficient to continue hiring an adequate number of part-time judges to help control that caseload while the jury session was in operation, the justices said.
Administrative Justice of the District Courts Edwin W. Kelly joined with the Supreme Court in commending the district court judges and staff for their hard work and dedication to the jury session. "I am proud of the way our district court judges and staff managed these cases," Kelly said. But he added that the rest of the district court system is "in dire need of the additional judicial resources this will make available to us."
Currently, defendants found guilty of serious misdemeanors by a judge in district court can appeal convictions to the Superior Court and have a trial before a jury. The intent of the district court jury session, which began in 1992, was to help address the issue of lack of courtroom space and judges in the Superior Court for handling misdemeanor cases by providing jury trials in the district court.
Since then, however, improvements have been made in the Superior Court system, including a new courthouse in Rockingham County and new case management techniques. Those changes make it possible to give the same attention to misdemeanor trials as is given to all other cases in the Superior Court, the justices said.
Superior Court Chief Justice Walter L. Murphy said the change would have no significant impact on court operations. "We have been talking about this for some time," he said. "We are prepared to deal with it."
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2001-001
Effective April 1, 2001, the regional jury sessions of the district courts in Merrimack and Rockingham counties, established pursuant to RSA 502-A:12-a, and the following Supreme Court Administrative Orders are suspended indefinitely. The jurisdiction of the district courts in Merrimack and Rockingham counties over criminal cases is set forth in RSA 502-A:11. A defendant in a class A misdemeanor case arraigned in the district court on or after April 1, 2001, shall have the right to appeal a conviction to the superior court in accordance with RSA 502-A:12 and RSA 599:1.
The affected Supreme Court Administrative Orders are as follows:
Administrative Order 92-7, November 30, 1992
Administrative Order 93-1, February 16, 1993
Administrative Order 93-5, April 29, 1993
Administrative Order 93-6, May 25, 1993
Administrative Order 93-7, September 2, 1993
Administrative Order 94-003, September 14, 1994
Administrative Order 95-002, June 30, 1995
Administrative Order 96-002, March 18, 1996
Administrative Order 96-008, November 26, 1996
Administrative Order 98-004, July 28, 1998
In addition, the special district court jury trial rules, adopted by order dated December 4, 1992, and extended pending further order of the court by Administrative Order 94-003, dated September 14, 1994, are suspended indefinitely.
Dated: March 12, 2001
ATTEST:
Howard J. Zibel, Clerk
New Hampshire Supreme Court
|