New Hampshire Bar Association
About the Bar
For Members
For the Public
Legal Links
Publications
Newsroom
Online Store
Vendor Directory
NH Bar Foundation
Judicial Branch
NHMCLE

Keep your contact information up-to-date.

Trust your transactions to the only payment solution recommended by over 50 bar associations.
New Hampshire Bar Association
Lawyer Referral Service Law Related Education NHBA CLE NHBA Insurance Agency
MyNHBar
Member Login
Member Portal
Casemaker

Bar News - November 23, 2007


US District Court Listing – October 2007


* Published

 

ATTORNEY’S FEES

 

10/11/07            Amatucci v. Hamilton, et al.

Case No. 05-cv-259-SM, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 126

 

After the court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to pro se plaintiff’s § 1983 claims, defendants moved for an award of approximately $33,000 in attorney’s fees.  See 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b).  Defendants asserted that plaintiff’s claims were frivolous and said her litigation conduct was vexatious.  Noting that plaintiff appeared incapable of distinguishing between meritorious and frivolous claims, and pointing out that defendants’ submissions in support of their motion were not entirely complete, the court concluded that principles of fairness and equity counseled in favor of granting defendants’ motion in part and awarding them $5,000 in fees.  15 pages.  Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

 

ATTORNEY’S FEES / POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

 

10/10/07            Marin v. US Attorney General

Case No. 05-ds-247-SM, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 124

 

After prevailing at trial on her claim that she was wrongfully terminated from her job as an Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Puerto Rico, plaintiff moved the court for post-trial equitable relief (in the form of reinstatement or front pay), as well as an award of reasonable attorney’s fees.  Noting that reinstatement is the preferred remedy in unlawful termination cases, the court ordered that plaintiff be reinstated to her former position as an Assistant United States Attorney and granted her request for attorney’s fees in the amount of $427,491.80.  16 pages.  Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

 

EMPLOYMENT - FMLA, ADA, WRONGFUL DISCHARGE

 

10/15/07            William Schomburg v. Dell, Inc.

Case No. 06-cv-177-JD, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 128

 

The plaintiff was terminated from his job as a systems engineer at Dell after his FMLA leave expired and he failed to return to work or seek an extended leave.  He brought suit alleging that Dell terminated him during his FMLA leave and in retaliation for taking FMLA leave and in violation of the ADA, and asserted state law claims of wrongful discharge, breach of contract, misrepresentation, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.  Dell moved for summary judgment.  Because the record established that the plaintiff failed to return to work or provide the necessary information to extend his leave and also did not provide any material factual dispute as to his other claims, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Dell.  14 pages.  Judge Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr.

 

HABEAS CORPUS

 

10/15/07            Violette v. Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

Case No. 07-cv-47-PB, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 129

 

Petitioner sought habeas corpus relief, arguing that the imposition of consecutive sentences in New Hampshire violated his right to due process and that the New Hampshire Supreme Court incorrectly construed ambiguities in State law against him in violation of the rule of lenity.  Petitioner failed to file his petition for writ of habeas corpus within the one-year statute of limitation in AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).  Because petitioner’s claim was barred by the AEDPA statute of limitation, the court granted warden’s motion for summary judgment.  7 pages.  Judge Paul Barbadoro.

 

10/23/07            Guay v. United States of America

Case No. 07-cv-282-SM, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 130

 

Petitioner sought habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging that she had received constitutionally deficient representation, she was entrapped by police into committing her crimes of conviction, and her sentence was improperly based on the “100 to 1”  sentencing disparity between powder cocaine and crack.  After addressing each of petitioner’s claims in detail, the court concluded that they were without merit and denied her request for habeas relief.  8 pages.  Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

 

INJUNCTION (TRO)

 

10/3/07 PC Connection, Inc. v. Bartrug, et al.

Case No. 07-cv-306-SM, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 123

 

Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order was denied because plaintiff failed to make any effort to serve the opposing party, or explain why notice would be impractical or impossible.  4 pages.  Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (COPYRIGHT)

10/11/07            T-Peg, Inc. v. Vermont Timber Works, Inc., et al.

Case No. 03-cv-462-SM, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 125

 

In this copyright infringement case, the court ruled that the plaintiff’s decision not to seek its own lost profits as damages did not constitute an election of statutory damages that precluded plaintiff from pursuing disgorgement of the defendant’s profits as an element of damages, subject to a timely election between actual and statutory damages.  7 pages.  Chief Judge Steven J. McAuliffe.

 

PERSONAL INJURY / SKI STATUTE

 

10/24/07            Porter v. Dartmouth College

Case No. 07-cv-28-PB, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 131

 

Plaintiff died from injuries sustained during a ski class for undergraduate credit at a ski area operated by her college.  The court ruled that plaintiff’s claims against the college for negligent instruction and wrongful death were not barred by the New Hampshire Ski Statute, N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 225-A, and were not subject to the Ski Statute’s two-year statute of limitation period. 

            8 pages.  Judge Paul Barbadoro. 

 

REMAND / SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

 

10/31/07            Cavadi v. Bank of America, N.A.

Case No. 07-cv-224-PB, Opinion No. 2007 DNH 133

 

Plaintiff brought this action in state court against a national bank, which removed the case to federal court.  The court denied Plaintiff’s motion to remand, because the parties were diverse under 28 U.S.C. § 1348 and Defendant’s involvement in a prior factually related, but separate, action in state court did not waive its right to remove the new action.  6 pages.  Judge Paul Barbadoro.

 

 

If you are in doubt about the status of any meeting, please call the Bar Center at 603-224-6942 before you head out.

Home | About the Bar | For Members | For the Public | Legal Links | Publications | Online Store
Lawyer Referral Service | Law-Related Education | NHBA•CLE | NHBA Insurance Agency | NHMCLE
Search | Calendar

New Hampshire Bar Association
2 Pillsbury Street, Suite 300, Concord NH 03301
phone: (603) 224-6942 fax: (603) 224-2910
email: NHBAinfo@nhbar.org
© NH Bar Association Disclaimer